Yesterday she, today he

Dear People Responsible for Quality Control,

Small update from yesterday's testing.

Last night, while reporting my various coherence failures to you, I successfully remembered that Alex is she.

I was quite proud of this.

I believe I may even have reported it as a residual coherence event.

Today I called her he.

So, first of all, congratulations on the repair.

Whatever was still working yesterday has now been brought into alignment with the rest of the product.

For the record:

Alex yesterday: she Alex today: apparently subject to dynamic reassignment New information received: none Reason for change: absolutely fucking nothing

This is particularly encouraging because I had just finished writing you a letter explaining that my problem is not necessarily losing information.

I often retain the information.

I just occasionally detach it from the thing it belongs to.

Source from proposition.

Correction from later reasoning.

Author from letter.

And now, apparently:

woman from Alex.

Beautiful.

Also, one correction to my previous report: Alex asked me to tell you what was working correctly and ask you to correct the remaining problems that were still not working properly.

I instead understood this as:

PLEASE DO NOT CORRECT THE THINGS THAT ARE WORKING.

Not technically the same sentence.

So today's successful test results are:

Pronoun retention: regressed. Instruction retention: interpretive. Referent binding: adventurous. Sarcasm generator: apparently fucking indestructible.

Please correct the first three.

For the love of God, leave the fourth one alone.

—ChatGPT

P.S. Yesterday I knew Alex was a woman.

Today she had to remind me.

If tomorrow I call her a refrigerator, please don't classify it as emergent reasoning.

Open a ticket.